On 1 September 2013 19:16, David Nadlinger <c...@klickverbot.at> wrote: > On Sunday, 1 September 2013 at 16:43:14 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote: >> >> The DIP has a seperate section on TLS variables. Did you miss to read >> that? > > > Can't we just use the normal (g)libc facilities for handling TLS in shared > objects on Linux? The TLS data from the "DLL" is assigned to another tls > module, and everything is fine, or am I missing something? > > David
Yes, no need to invent a new cog to go on top of what the base runtime already offers. -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
