Am 01.09.2013 21:19, schrieb Iain Buclaw:
On 1 September 2013 19:16, David Nadlinger <c...@klickverbot.at> wrote:
On Sunday, 1 September 2013 at 16:43:14 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
The DIP has a seperate section on TLS variables. Did you miss to read
that?
Can't we just use the normal (g)libc facilities for handling TLS in shared
objects on Linux? The TLS data from the "DLL" is assigned to another tls
module, and everything is fine, or am I missing something?
David
Yes, no need to invent a new cog to go on top of what the base runtime
already offers.
Basically I thought whatever is inside the Description would go into the
spec. Everything inside the implementation details is just a suggestion
for implementing proper dllexport / dllimport on windows plattforms. We
shouldn't hard wire these implementation suggestions into the spec.
