On 2 September 2013 23:50, Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On 9/2/13, Manu <turkey...@gmail.com> wrote: > > But I still barely see this as an inconvenience when compared to not > being > > able to read a class definition. > > How about not being able to read the include paths in VS? I'm talking > about this: > > http://i.stack.imgur.com/0cTZG.png > > You can view 2 lines at a time. After almost 20 years they still > haven't fixed this. Where is their core dev team that should make the > IDE experience great? > Classic. Or the one where the find window gets wider and wider every time you open it, until it's bigger than the screen... Contrary to how it may seem, I don't actually love Visual Studio as hard as you may think. I'd love for MonoDevelop perhaps to supersede it... but it's just not there yet. Not by a long shot. MS are doing their best to ruin VS with every revision. Myself and most VS users I know tend to only update maybe 5 years after new releases, when they're forced to because someone pulled support for older versions. For me, I absolutely will not work without a symbolic debugger, and the VS experience is basically unparalleled there. It's also industry standard, so whether I like it or not, that's what I use, and I've adapted over many years.