On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 23:35:47 +0100, Paulo Pinto <pj...@progtools.org>
wrote:
Am 07.09.2013 23:57, schrieb Ramon:> On Saturday, 7 September 2013 at
20:02:37 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
>> Am 07.09.2013 21:55, schrieb Peter Alexander:
>>> On Saturday, 7 September 2013 at 19:39:21 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
>>>> Sadly, Visual Studio is a huge player in the game. Make the
>>>> connection :-)
>>>
>>> Why sadly? It's a fantastic product.
>>
>> The only thing I don't like is the reliance on Visual Assist and
>> ReSharper for refactoring features that other IDEs offer out of the
box.
>>
>> --
>> Paulo
>
> I'm both pro and against it.
>
> Pro because VisualD seems to be (Pardon me, I don't work on Windoze
and
> didn't work with it but trust Windoze D users opinion on that) an
> excellent solution and supporting nicely what seems to be *the* IDE in
> Windoze world.
>
> Against because we need a solution for *all* major platforms (Lx32,
> Lx64, *BSD, apple, w32,w64) and I'm worried that this resolution here
> might lead to a "So, we *do* have an IDE. Case closed" attitude.
>
> Kudos anyway to Rainer though for his important work.
>
> A+ -R
Well, if you want a production quality multi-platform IDE the only
options are InteliJ and Eclipse, both of which are not that well
received by most C and C++ guys. The target audience for D.
Eclipse is dreadful. I hate it with a passion.
That is my humble opinion, regarding the type of tooling I expect from
an IDE.
My solution: Do all development on windows, commit, update on build
machine, rinse and repeat ... that said, I haven't had to do fully cross
platform work for at least 7 years.
R
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
