On Tuesday, 17 September 2013 at 11:43:24 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
These examples came from a set of experiments where I was trying to do something which I expected would probably not be possible: make a template function generate different code 1) without varying the function types, 2) without explicitly instantiating the template using "!". (this was for compatibility purposes).
It should not be possible as template instances with same template parameter list share same body in code gen.
