On Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 11:32:18 UTC, renoX wrote:
I'm not sure you understood my point: a 'normal' function takes
inputS and produce an output, in the notation: a,b->c you can
clearly see the inputS and the output with a minimum of 'syntax
noise' around them.
In the notation a -> b -> c, the 'syntax noise' is bigger
(those arrows between the input parameters are much more 'heavy
on the eye' than a quote), and what does it bring?
Nothing..
It's the notation which makes the function type less readable
which I consider a mistake.
You are putting artificial barrier here.
a -> b -> c is a function that take a as parameter and return a
function that take b as parameter and return c. The concept of
multiple parameters and stuff like that exists only in your mind.
You try to map a concept you have in your mind in the language
when it DO NOT exist in the language.
