21.09.2013 21:41, Zhouxuan пишет:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11086
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10970

I've found and reported these bugs after about merely 100 LOCs written
down.
Should I continue?

Despite these tiny issues, I see a lot of people complain about
container, GC etc, but I can't found any offical reply, also no roadmap
at all.

A year or two ago it was a lot of wrong-code bugs with lambdas and nested functions making e.g. `std.algorithm` almost unusable. But it's only the beginning. OPTLINK bug causing random linking failures thus making the whole language unusable for real projects was fixed only about half a year ago.

And all this time I liked D except "the language is stable" words. And when half a year ago D become fully usable I become happy. For me "enough stability" is an ability to grab my copy of tool-chain and work with it without random failures.

Since then I had not any real problems with breaking changes or regressions. Generally regressions are fixed quickly and as for me the more breaking changes the better language we get. )

--
Денис В. Шеломовский
Denis V. Shelomovskij

Reply via email to