On Tue, 01 Oct 2013 21:55:16 +0200 "monarch_dodra" <monarchdo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 1 October 2013 at 03:58:04 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > > You know, this sounds like something that really should fall > > squarely in > > the category of "do the right thing by default". Is there any > > reason > > druntime can't be made to handle this better by default? > > Well, arguably, a segfault is a catastrophic error, even more > serious than an assert. > > I'm not sure what "the right thing" would even be, apart from > dying right there and then...? > > Even just throwing an error could be problematic (AFAIK). I'm not talking about segfaults, I'm talking about the OP's issue of a mere Ctrl-C causing cleanup code to not get executed.