On 10/6/13 10:10 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Sunday, 6 October 2013 at 17:08:25 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
isn't this really what has just been discussed under the proposed name
of stdx?
... and if so, why isn't it being used?
This is exactly why I'm not too thrilled to make another attempt at
establishing something like that. ;)
We could improve things on our end by featuring etc documentation more
prominently etc. I don't think there's a need to reboot things with
stdx. Just improve etc.
Andrei
