On 10/10/2013 09:33 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > I honestly don't think we can solve it a different way without completely > redesigning shared. shared is specifically designed such that you have to > either cast it way to do anything with it or write all of your code to > explicitly work with shared, which is not something that generally makes > sense > to do unless you're creating a type whose only value is in being shared > across > threads. Far more frequently, you want to share a type which you would also > use normally as a thread-local variable, and that means casting. > > - Jonathan M Davis +1
- Re: The "no gc" crowd deadalnix
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Jacob Carlborg
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Jonathan M Davis
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Jonathan M Davis
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Sean Kelly
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Jonathan M Davis
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Sean Kelly
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Jacob Carlborg
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Jonathan M Davis
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Robert Schadek
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Jacob Carlborg
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Michel Fortin
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Jacob Carlborg
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Michel Fortin
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Jacob Carlborg
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Jacob Carlborg
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Michel Fortin
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Sean Kelly
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Michel Fortin
- Re: The "no gc" crowd Andrei Alexandrescu