On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:42:17 -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 12:36:08AM +0200, deadalnix wrote: >> First thing. I see std.linarg I have no clue whatsoever what it even >> may be about. Do we really want to have a standard lib with names that >> look like base64 encoded ? > > I picked it up immediately. It's an obvious abbreviation of "linear > algebra". > > I'm not sure I understand this resentment against abbreviated names. By > your argument, we should rename std.xml to std.extensibleMarkupLanguage > instead. Bring on the rainbow, the bikeshed is up for painting. > > > T
Don't be silly. It'd obviously have to be "standardLibrary.extensibleMarkupLanguage"