On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:39:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
As `std.logger` is still marked as "work in progress" this thread is less formal that typical pre-voting review. Goal is to provide as much input about desirable `std.logger` functionality and current state and let module author to use this information for preparing proposal for actual review / voting.
Would be nice if either FileLogger, or a "proxy" logger available to users, would add timestamps. Timestamps are very useful for log files, as they allow to correlate logged events with other events on the system (e.g. other applications' log files or file modification times), so I think they should be there by default.
My personal preference of timestamp format is "[YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS.FFF] " (though it needs to be either UTC or additionally specify the timezone, to disambiguate overlapping local time when DST ends).
