On 10/14/2013 02:42 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: > Would be nice if either FileLogger, or a "proxy" logger available to > users, would add timestamps. Timestamps are very useful for log files, > as they allow to correlate logged events with other events on the > system (e.g. other applications' log files or file modification > times), so I think they should be there by default. Good point, a timestamp will be part of the future struct passed down to logMessage.
- Re: Early review of std.logger Sönke Ludwig
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Sönke Ludwig
- Re: Early review of std.logge... Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Guillaume Chatelet
- Re: Early review of std.logger Jeremy Powers
- Re: Early review of std.logger Guillaume Chatelet
- Re: Early review of std.logger Jeremy Powers
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Vladimir Panteleev
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Martin Drasar
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Martin Drasar
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Martin Drasar
- Re: Early review of std.logger Dicebot
- Re: Early review of std.logger Dicebot
- Re: Early review of std.logger Andrea Fontana
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger SomeDude