"Tim Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > Nick Sabalausky wrote: >> "Tim Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:[email protected]... >>>> b) "(1,3)" already means two things, neither of which has anything to >>>> do >>> Could you kindly state those? >>> >>> I can see that just having "(1,3)" preceded with the "case" keyword >>> makes most other meanings impossible. >> >> One is a function paramater list. Someone else said it's also an >> expression that evaluates to 3, but that seems beyond useless to me. > > Neither. Functions can't be named case and expressions with no effect must > be cast to void.
Huh? I think we got out-of-sync when I accidentially quoted more than I meant to. I was responding specifically to "(1,3) already means two things...Could you kindly state those?"
