On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:15:45 -0700 Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:
> > http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1oi8wd/ruby_is_a_dying_language/ccs8yr8 > Totally agree. 90+% of the argument for dynamic languages is "getting shit done", and yet they ultimately *create* work: More unittests, more roadblocks optimizing for memory/speed, and (the biggest IMO) much more debugging due to statically-checkable errors being silently converted into hidden bugs. More of my notes on the dynamic "getting shit done" emperor having no clothes: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6530465 http://semitwist.com/articles/article/view/why-i-hate-python-or-any-dynamic-language-really