On 10/17/13 10:45 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
I believe this was the behavior of D1, is not true in D2 and must not be true for immutable arrays such as string.
Yes, there have been repeated discussions in this group about changing that behavior, it created pernicious long-distance dependencies (someone would pass a slice to someone else, and they'd start trampling into the caller's data. For a while it seemed there would be no reasonable solution, until we finally figured the whole capacity caching thing.
Andrei
