On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:39:51 +0200, Dicebot wrote: > As `std.logger` is still marked as "work in progress" this thread is > less formal that typical pre-voting review. Goal is to provide as much > input about desirable `std.logger` functionality and current state and > let module author to use this information for preparing proposal for > actual review / voting. > > Lets unleash the forces of constructive destruction. > > ===== Meta ===== > > Code: > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1500/files Docs: > http://burner.github.io/phobos/phobos-prerelease/std_logger.html > > First announcement / discussion thread : > http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.313.1377180809.1719.digitalmars- d...@puremagic.com
std.logger is a good start, but I must admit I do not like the way it is architectured. I use Java's Logging and Log4J for years so naturally I compare std.logger with these two frameworks (that are heavily used in production). std.logger is a bad name, IMHO - it should be std.logging as there will be many Logger implementations there I presume...
