On 11/04/2013 06:27 PM, Dicebot wrote: > On Monday, 4 November 2013 at 17:08:21 UTC, Robert Schadek wrote: >>> 4. >>> >>> Static "namespace" classes are redundant and should be replaced with >>> module-scope globals. >> not sure either > > My concern here is that if we need explicit additional symbol > qualification to avoid collisions, D module system has failed. But I > believe it actually works just fine, the problem is in habit of using > imports in a way similar to C++ includes. Phobos should do more about > endorsing power usage of D modules, not resort to demands of > unad(a/o)pted ones :) Can you give an example, I'm not sure if I know what you mean.
- Re: Structured logging (was Early review of st... ilya-stromberg
- Re: Early review of std.logger ilya-stromberg
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger ilya-stromberg
- Re: Early review of std.logger Dejan Lekic
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Dicebot
- Re: Early review of std.logger Dicebot
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Dicebot
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Dicebot
- Re: Early review of std.logger Robert Schadek
- Re: Early review of std.logger Jacob Carlborg
- Re: Early review of std.logger Dicebot
- Re: Early review of std.logger Tavi Cacina
- Re: Early review of std.logger Dicebot