On Thursday, 24 October 2013 at 08:20:43 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 24 October 2013 08:18, Mike <n...@none.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 24 October 2013 at 06:37:08 UTC, Iain Buclaw
wrote:
On 24 October 2013 06:37, Walter Bright
<newshou...@digitalmars.com>
wrote:
On 10/23/2013 5:43 PM, Mike wrote:
'shared' guarantees that all reads and writes specified in
source code
happen in the exact order specified with no omissions, as there
may be
other threads reading/writing to the variable at the same time.
All that's missing is a guarantee that the reading/writing
actually occur at the intended address and not in some compiler
cache.