On Thursday, 24 October 2013 at 21:20:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The way I see that could be done is by defining a
ScopedAllocator that uses internally an AffixAllocator with a
doubly-linked list tracking all allocations. In the destructor,
ScopedAllocator would walk the list and deallocate everything
allocated since its construction.
Can this be generalized as a proxy allocator which simply
implements deallocateAll, on top of its parent allocator's
primitives?
The list can be singly-linked if random deallocation is not
needed.
