On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 04:30:37 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Thursday, 24 October 2013 at 19:11:03 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/24/2013 11:33 AM, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 24 October 2013 at 17:02:51 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/24/2013 4:18 AM, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 24 October 2013 at 06:48:07 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/23/2013 11:19 PM, Mike wrote:
Maybe /shared/'s definition needs to be further defined to
ensure all compilers implement it the same way, and be
unambiguous enough to provide a solution to this /volatile/
debate.
The problem with shared alone variable is that it can be simply
placed by the optimizer at another memory location than the
intended one, even if all threads are seeing it "as if" at the
intended location.
