On 11/10/13 12:38 PM, Timothee Cour wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com <mailto:d...@me.com>> wrote:On 2013-11-10 19:44, deadalnix wrote: It is also a given that many feature could have been avoided in the first place given that one. I agree. It seems at least a couple of features could have been implemented using AST macros instead. -- /Jacob Carlborg I agree; eg, just to name 2 features that I proposed that could be simply implemented via AST macros as Jacob said: * [proposal: a new string litteral to embed variables in a string <http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.94.1383254681.9546.digitalmar...@puremagic.com> http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.94.1383254681.9546.digitalmar...@puremagic.com] * [Re: feature request: __ARGS__ for logging (cf __FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNC___ http://forum.dlang.org/post/kegmp0$30dn$1...@digitalmars.com] It seems we could even get rid of __FILE__,__LINE__,__MODULE__ with AST macros.
This would be a very small advantage. The special variables hardly cause any trouble.
Andrei
