On Monday, 11 November 2013 at 17:05:15 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
There is current no 'release' per say for Go. So the version
of Go would
be whatever was the current stable as of the GCC release (or
closing of
stage1 development).
Well, you do realize it is completely unsuitable for D and will
never work this way, don't you? :) And while I generally like to
rant about lack of stable development process, GCC inverted
approach seems much worse for anything that is not set in stone
language covered by formalistic standard.
