On 2013-11-15 00:36, Nick wrote:
I have no idea what everyone is getting worked up about. My
understanding of the plan is that there are biannual major releases,
with bug fix releases in-between, for those people/companies who need
stability/dependability.
In addition to that we have monthly 'beta' releases for those who want
the latest and greatest but know that a few things may get changed
around between the releases that break code and that there are likely to
be more bugs.
So all the passionate D devs here get their monthly releases, and the
people who want maximum stability get a biannual, LTS release along with
some bug fix releases.
The opposite of an LTS release is _not_ a beta release. It's a regular
release. It seems it would be better if the beta release were regular
releases and the releases were LTS releases.
I'm having a hard time requiring my users to use anything that is not a
release (that is, a beta).
--
/Jacob Carlborg
