On 23/11/13 10:42, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Must say that, whatever the behind-the-scenes of the implementation, it seems a shame to lose the nice z = x + y*i notation.OTOH I guess that could lead to ambiguous code, e.g. int i = 4; complex z = x + y*i; // what does i mean here?
I was wrong about this -- you have to write
complex z = x + y * 1i
... which is unambiguous though I guess potentially still prone to typos :-)
