On 2013-11-28 20:17, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The zip has nothing to do with the stability of D itself. It just has to do with the stalibity of how D is distributed, which is a completely different issue. I can see why you care about the zip, given that you wrote and maintain a tool which relies on it, but calling D unstable because we might change how we release it would be like calling KDE or gnome unstable, because they changed from distributing their code in tar.gz files to tar.bz2 files. How a program or library is distributed has nothing to do with the stability of the code itself.
So where do we draw the line, what's considered to be part of D, if the releases aren't.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
