bearophile Wrote: > - making D2 fitter for the LLVM back-end; I do not think this is necessary. LDC can implement most of D1 just fine on top of LLVM. The omissions are minor: http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc/wiki/Docs#Violationsofthespecification
Exposing particular features of the backend to the user should be done through compiler-specific extensions. See http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc/wiki/InlineAsmExpressions for an example. Otherwise you'll make implementing a correct backend for D even harder.
