On 12/12/13 10:01, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Currently I always advocate that C and C++ development should
always be done with warnings as errors enabled, coupled with
static analyzers at very least during CI builds, breaking them if
anything is found.
I do think I owe quite a bit to the university professor who took the scientific
programming course, for instructing us to compile with
gcc -ansi -pedantic -Wall
Not as comprehensive as -Werror etc., but still a good way to be started off in
programming life. It's meant that I've always subsequently appreciated the
existence and value of language standards.
And it's generated much amusement among academic colleagues: "Finally, there is
such a virtuous saint among us!" or words to that effect :-P
