Jussi Jumppanen wrote:
BCS Wrote:
If I'm understanding the situation correctly, what you just
described is ONLY a problem on Windows and only because
of a design flaw in the way DLL's work.
That might be well be the case.
But to basically then say that “when developing with D on Windows
it is highly recommended that DLL's are not used” will just end up
sounding like limitation of D and not of Windows DLLs.
I know a simple counter measure: use DLLs as a container for the DDL
specific format. AFAIK C# does exactly the same.
By the way, can't you simply put the runtime into a DLL, and load that
by the host program? D DLL would also depend from the runtime DLL. Then
the runtime would be shared, wouldn't it?
