On Tuesday, 17 December 2013 at 17:17:39 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 12/17/13, Byron <byron.he...@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't know why we can't do this instead:
if (foo in ["alpha", "beta", "delta"] ) {
You can come pretty close with:
if (foo in A["alpha", "beta", "delta"] )
Here's the code:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mailman.111.1325867961.16222.digitalmar...@puremagic.com#post-mailman.111.1325867961.16222.digitalmars-d:40puremagic.com
Wow that is a lot of hoops to jump through to simulate a fairly
simple operator. Probably not something anyone new to D is going
to do.
the in operator needs some real love. I would think you could do
even more with in
if("ello" in "Hello World") { // I would think that this could
return a slice
}
LinkedList!int list = makeList();
enforce(45 in list, "oh no we must have 45 in the linked list or
all is lost");
!in would be nice, not sure how it could work if in returns
pointers/refs/slices
