On Saturday, 11 January 2014 at 21:42:46 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
12-Jan-2014 01:22, monarch_dodra пишет:
On Saturday, 11 January 2014 at 20:36:31 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2014-01-11 08:50, Brad Anderson wrote:
The recent discussion got me wondering how Phobos stacked up
against the C++ Boost String Algorithms library.
Some background on the design of the Boost library:
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_55_0/doc/html/string_algo/design.html
TL;DR: It works somewhat like ranges.
Google Spreadsheet with the comparison: http://goo.gl/Wmotu4
toLower/Upper doesn't really work in place.
Yeah, "toLowerInplace" is actually more like
"toLowerProbablyInPlace"
With high probablity :)
And it's indeed quite high, the amount of "bad sheep" that gets
longer/shorter across the whole Unicode is around 5-10
codepoints IRC.
More important than the absolute amount of "bad sheep" is the
frequency of them in your input :-)
