On Sunday, 12 January 2014 at 17:51:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I understand the theory. The data simply doesn't support it.
There's plenty of opened issues for Phobos and plenty of pull
requests for it. Yet dmd is doing a lot better in terms of
contributors.
Andrei
This could also be because dmd has more *reviewers*, and is
generally *active*.
Related: You still have 2 pulls in phobos that are basically
merge ready, they just need you the "final touches". But you
aren't responding to the pings.
On topic: I wouldn't mind seeing more bounties in Phobos. I'd
gladly take them on, but there aren't any.
Another idea would be to give a financial incentive to the
*reviewers* to review high priority commits.
