On Friday, 7 February 2014 at 08:10:58 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
Weird. atomicLoad(raw) should be the same as atomicLoad(acq), and atomicStore(raw) should be the same as atomicStore(rel). At least on x86. I don't know why that change made a difference in performance.
huh?
--8<-- core/atomic.d
template needsLoadBarrier( MemoryOrder ms )
{
enum bool needsLoadBarrier = ms != MemoryOrder.raw;
}
-->8--
Didn't you write this? :)
