On Friday, 7 February 2014 at 16:57:50 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Friday, 7 February 2014 at 16:36:03 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
No barriers in sight.
Awesome. Then I think we can go back to the old logic.
Cool. Also, from
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/atomic/memory_order:
--8<--
On strongly-ordered systems (x86, SPARC, IBM mainframe),
release-acquire ordering is automatic for the majority of
operations. No additional CPU instructions are issued for this
synchronization mode, only certain compiler optimizations are
affected (e.g. the compiler is prohibited from moving non-atomic
stores past the atomic store-release or perform non-atomic loads
earlier than the atomic load-acquire)
-->8--
