On Sunday, 9 February 2014 at 12:30:56 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
* Could we put this in a more general package, like std.memory.buffer.scopebuffer. Then the upcoming std.allocator could be placed in std.memory.allocator
I don't like "buffer" as a package name at all. Probably better approach is to put it in same package with Appender and make it common package for all standard output range implementations.
Its relation to std.allocator is just a (desired) implementation detail.
