On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Matej Nanut <matejna...@gmail.com> wrote:
> However it might've been nicer if you didn't have to write "let mut" but > just "mut". > > Something similar had been discussed if I recall correctly, and was rejected. Consider: `let (x, mut y) = (1, 2);` which would otherwise have not been possible.
