On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 05:08:02PM +0000, Dicebot wrote: > On Friday, 7 March 2014 at 17:04:30 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: > >I think that if we are to draw a line somewhere on what to support > >and not, the decision should not be embedded as deep into the > >language. Ideally, it would be clearly visible in the code that > >you are counting code points. > > Well if you consider really breaking changes, simply prohibiting > plain random access to char[] and forcing to use either .raw or > .decode is one thing I'd love to see (with .byGrapheme as library > cherry on top)
I don't understand what advantage this would bring. T -- Frank disagreement binds closer than feigned agreement.
