On 3/9/2014 6:31 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/9/2014 6:08 AM, "Marc Schütz" <schue...@gmx.net>" wrote:
Also, `byCodeUnit` and `byCodePoint` would probably be better names
than `raw`
and `decode`, to much the already existing `byGrapheme` in std.uni.
I'd vastly prefer 'byChar', 'byWchar', 'byDchar' for each of string,
wstring, dstring, and InputRange!char, etc.
'byCodePoint' and 'byDchar' are the same. However, 'byCodeUnit' is
completely different from anything else:
string str;
wstring wstr;
dstring dstr;
(str|wchar|dchar).byChar // Always range of char
(str|wchar|dchar).byWchar // Always range of wchar
(str|wchar|dchar).byDchar // Always range of dchar
str.representation // Range of ubyte
wstr.representation // Range of ushort
dstr.representation // Range of uint
str.byCodeUnit // Range of char
wstr.byCodeUnit // Range of wchar
dstr.byCodeUnit // Range of dchar
