"BLS" <windev...@hotmail.de> wrote in message news:h4oeb0$5s...@digitalmars.com... > Walter Bright wrote: >> BLS wrote: >>> What I don't see is why a property isn't just a property. What you >>> announce is more a kind of "universal maybe these value holder" >>> - a temporary object is not a property period >> >> Even returning an 'int' is a temporary object. > > ?
He means it's a temporary value, not actually an object.
