On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:17:08 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
On 3/14/14, 4:37 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Walter Bright" wrote in message news:lfu74a$8cr$1...@digitalmars.com...
> No, it doesn't, because it is not usable if C introduces any virtual
> methods.
That's what the !final storage class is for.
My mistake, I forgot you'd said you were in favor of this. Being able
to 'escape' final certainly gets us most of the way there.
!final is really rather hideous though.
A few possibilities discussed around here:
!final
~final
final(false)
@disable final
I've had an epiphany literally a few seconds ago that "final(false)" has
the advantage of being generalizable to "final(bool)" taking any
CTFE-able Boolean.
Yes yes yes!
Consider also final!false (i.e. parameterize final)
-Steve
