On 2009-07-29 11:24:18 -0400, Ary Borenszweig <a...@esperanto.org.ar> said:

Michel Fortin wrote:
I'd go with "ConnectAction" to make sure there's a noun. The rule following the "don't repeat the base class name" one is aimed at allowing this specific usage. It says:

"""
It is fine to repeat the base type name in the derived type name if the derived type is only a specialization having the same function:

    class RemoteObject : Object { } // right
    class TcpSocket : Socket { }    // right
"""

Obviously it doesn't seem too well worded. Any alternative suggestion?

I like it like that. It's a good rule. :)

I added your ConnectAction example, this way there is an example with a verb in front of a noun.

--
Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com
http://michelf.com/

Reply via email to