On 2014-03-24 00:41, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/23/14, 9:29 PM, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On 2014-03-24 00:04, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/23/14, 8:22 PM, Etienne Cimon wrote:
How about allowing it only inside parenthesis?
That works but breaks more valid code. -- Andrei
If the comma expression operator is outlawed on the global scope,
variadic template parameters could be used with commas outside the
parantheses which allows such syntax:
if(pMgr->ShouldRecordEvent(eSE_Weapon), pOwnerRaw) // ERROR
return pMgr->RecordEvent(eSE_Weapon), pOwnerRaw; // ERROR
if(e!pMgr->ShouldRecordEvent(eSE_Weapon), pOwnerRaw) // OK
return e!pMgr->RecordEvent(eSE_Weapon), pOwnerRaw; // OK
Would it make sense to reserve the global e identifier for expressions?
With that the approach would be veering off the road. -- Andrei
Well, I'll vote for the compromise, there shouldn't be issues with
keeping statements in void contexts such as
int i, j, k;
i++, j++, k--;
etc.
And then I guess I'll change that part of my coding style, everyone
seems to hate it so much ..
