On Tuesday, 25 March 2014 at 19:09:01 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/25/14, 11:33 AM, Meta wrote:
Having the comma expression return void is a pretty clever way
of
disallowing most of its buggy usage. You mentioned in the
other thread
that we are looking at 5 years or more before the comma
operator can be
used in tuple expressions. Is that timeline still accurate
with these
proposed changes?
I'm afraid so. But that's the case regardless.
Andrei
Does this also mean a proper tuple syntax on a par with Go's is
going to wait for five years? That seems too long for what should
be a major feature and would suggest it should be done with
something other than the comma operator.
