On Friday, 11 April 2014 at 12:00:32 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:01:17 -0400, Tommi
<tommitiss...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, 11 April 2014 at 00:52:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
If @safe is just a convention, then I don't see the point of
having it at all. If it can't be a guarantee, then it's
pretty much another tech buzzword with no teeth.
In order to have @safe be a guarantee of memory-safety, we
need to prevent @safe code from calling any @trusted code.
Or manually guarantee the safety of @trusted code.
I should be able to write an application with only @safe
functions, and trust that phobos has implemented @trusted
functions properly.
-Steve
I was talking about @safe in general sense, not only as it
pertains to phobos.
