Dicebot:
It is unacceptable to have code that fails with one compiler and works with the other despite the shared frontend version. Such "enhanced" @nogc attributes must be placed into compiler-specific attribute space and not as a core language feature.
This problem was underlined during this thread far before the merging of the @nogc implementation. Why have Walter & Andrei ignored the problem? What's the point of creating a DIP if you ignore the problems found in its discussion? What's the point of 338 comment posts if Walter goes on anyway with the original idea? There are some problems in the D development method that must be addressed.
Bye, bearophile
