On 2014-04-25 16:28, bearophile wrote:
This problem was underlined during this thread far before the merging of the @nogc implementation. Why have Walter & Andrei ignored the problem? What's the point of creating a DIP if you ignore the problems found in its discussion? What's the point of 338 comment posts if Walter goes on anyway with the original idea? There are some problems in the D development method that must be addressed.
That's a problem. The problem is if someone has an idea/code it wants to be merged, it's enough to convince one developer with push right to get it merged.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
