On Thursday, 22 May 2014 at 19:40:23 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Thursday, 22 May 2014 at 19:20:12 UTC, Etienne wrote:
On 2014-05-22 3:11 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 5/22/2014 2:06 PM, Dicebot wrote:
Main blocker is transition to SDL as default project
description format
Is there anything blocking actual adoption of SDL? I'm not
holding
anything up am I? Sonke: If there's anything you need
done/dealt-with
regarding SDLang-D, let me know.
That's the last I heard about SDL:
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/issues/435#issuecomment-30734573
Maybe just missing some time for it. I'd be happy to the
example he posted implemented (populating the objects
automatically based on the SDL field names)
I think that's the case.
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/dub/wiki/Sdl-based-package-format-draft
(not sure how up to date this is with Ludwig's idea of how it
should work).
Yeah Sonke contributions to community are beyond any imagination
already. She should push for him and move forward (assuming he is
ok with it ;))
