On Friday, 23 May 2014 at 06:24:28 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 22/05/14 21:11, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Is there anything blocking actual adoption of SDL? I'm not
holding
anything up am I? Sonke: If there's anything you need
done/dealt-with
regarding SDLang-D, let me know.
Do we want/need the SDL parser/writer to be included into
Phobos first?
This is my concern. Waiting for another module to get into phobos
before DUB gets included is too much. Couldn't SDL be added later
as an option? (For small files like this I find this to be a
bikeshed issue. DUB files are very readable as is and I don't
like the idea of waiting 6 more months (as is typical in D))
