On 5/24/2014 10:15 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 23.05.2014 08:24, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 22/05/14 21:11, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Is there anything blocking actual adoption of SDL? I'm not holding
anything up am I? Sonke: If there's anything you need done/dealt-with
regarding SDLang-D, let me know.
No, SDLang-D is absolutely fine, it's just me being overloaded with
other things.
Do we want/need the SDL parser/writer to be included into Phobos first?
I'd include it as a "git subtree" into the repository, so that this
wouldn't be necessary. This copy would only used when building DUB using
the build.sh/.cmd. When DUB itself is used as a package/library, it
would use the sdlang-d DUB package instead.
Ok, sounds good to me.
But maybe I should put a "std.sdlang" through the phobos review queue to
help getting DUB into the standard DMD releases?
