Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:44:46 -0400, Ary Borenszweig
<a...@esperanto.org.ar> wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
What I'd like to see is something like this possible:
void foo (int timeout, string bar, float f = 4.0);
void foo(int timeout);
call!(foo)("timeout=5,bar=\"hello\"");
Taking into account the default value of f, what the parameters are
named, and which overload to call. I could certainly do it with C#.
This is interesting. It means we'd need reflection for parameter
names, which currently does not exist.
Why do it with strings? Why not
call!(foo)(5, "hello")
with varaidic args?
Ok, say foo is:
void foo(string bar, int timeout)
What's the difference?
